Parliamentary Disruptions

In News

  • Recently, Rajya Sabha suspended 19 Opposition members for ‘willfully obstructing the House’.

More about the issue

  • Disruptions & Political rivalries:
    • Disruption has become the norm, with the Opposition seeking to use the debates as a ploy to gain publicity.
    • Representatives of political parties are utilising Parliament more to showcase political spectacle than to use it as a forum for serious legislative functioning.
  • Party supporting wrongdoing of members: 
    • Party members have the support of their parties in breaking the rules, the threat of suspension from the House does not deter them.
  • Other issues:
    • Resort to money Bill route: 
      • Several key pieces of legislation have been passed as Money Bills, despite the fact that they did not fit this category.
    • Less scrutiny of Bills: 
      • Most of the bills were passed without any scrutiny, as they were passed in the same session in which they were introduced.
    • Frequent Adjournment of Parliament sessions: 
      • In recent times, Parliament sessions are adjourned frequently. This hampers the work of Parliament.

Role of Presiding Officer in case of disruptions

  • The general principle is that it is the role and duty of the Presiding Officer — Speaker of Lok Sabha and Chairman of Rajya Sabha — to maintain order so that the House can function smoothly. 
  • In order to ensure that proceedings are conducted in the proper manner, the Speaker/ Chairman is empowered to force a Member to withdraw from the House.

Outcomes:

  • Fall of parliamentary standards:
    • Opposition protests and ruling party vindictiveness have resulted in the fall of parliamentary standards.
    • Parliamentary discussion is a manifestation of a representative kind of democracy in operation, in the sense that representation of the people directly questions the government on matters of governance.
  • Reduced working hours of Parliament: 
    • The Parliament working hours are getting reduced day by day due to frequent disruptions.
  • Erosion of faith in Parliament:
    • Disruptions and ineffective functioning lead to a reduction in the trust of people in Parliament.
  • Wastage of taxpayers’ money:
    • Parliament not functioning to its fullest potential is the blatant wastage of taxpayers’ money.

Suggestions

  • Developing an Index: 
    • A parliamentary disruption index should be created as a measure to monitor disruptions in legislatures and check indiscipline. 
    • It would also lead to the availability of more time for debate and discussion on issues before the House.
  • Prevent disruption of its proceedings: 
    • There should be more efforts to prevent the disruptions in cases of deliberations on critical national issues. 
    • It is the only mechanism to ensure that disrupting its proceedings or allowing them to be disrupted ceases to be a viable option.
  • Enforcement of a code of conduct for MPs and MLAs: 
    • There must be strict adherence to the code of conduct for MPs and MLAs so that disruption of proceedings ceases to be an option.
  • Modify the Anti-Defection Act: 
    • Currently, MPs who deviate from their parties’ position earn a fatal whipping and lose their seats.
      • There should be modifications to the anti-defection law so that it applies only in cases where the government’s survival is at stake.
  • Increase in the working days of Parliament: 
    • Our legislature should meet throughout the year, like the parliaments of most developed democracies.
      • But these increased days will not help prevent disruptions if opposition parties don’t have the opportunity to debate and highlight important issues.
  • Accord private member bills more space and respect: 
    • This will allow a variety of ideas to bubble up from the grassroots.
    • Governments will be able to listen to non-mainstream points of view and provide official support whenever appropriate.
    • This will enable your MPs to truly become lawmakers.
  • Televise parliamentary committee proceedings: 
    • Bipartisanship and well-researched discussions are often the hallmarks of parliamentary committees. 
    • Yet this crucial aspect of the parliamentary process is well-hidden from the public.
  • Enable “Public Interest Legislation: 
    • Create a system that will enable MPs to hear the viewpoints of affected citizens and initiate appropriate policy responses.
  • Bring Transparency to the Clash of Interests: 
    • Before legislation is passed, various publics and groups find a way to articulate their viewpoints to key political decision-makers.
      • In India, this usually happens behind the scenes.

Way ahead

  • An attempt must be made by parliamentarians to tamp down on this hostility with the onus on doing so being more on the ruling party and its representatives.
  • There are enough tools, mechanisms, structures and precedents in India’s parliamentary history that can be relied upon by the current set of legislators to bring back useful deliberation. 
  • Parliamentarians must realise that the bedrock of a functioning democracy is a flourishing legislature.

UK Model of Parliament Working

  • In the UK, Parliament meets over 100 days a year & opposition parties get 20 days on which they decide the agenda for discussion.
  • The main opposition party gets 17 days and the remaining three days are given to the second-largest opposition party. 
  • In the UK, the PM is bound by a constitutional convention to respond to questions directly posed to him by MPs.
  • Canada also has a similar concept of opposition days.

 

Mains Practise Question 

[Q] Disrupting parliamentary proceedings is contempt of the House, can’t be a privilege. Discuss, how Parliament must deal with disruptions?