Manual Scavenging

In News 

  • Recently, some labourers in Mumbai, allegedly hired for manual scavenging, died after inhaling toxic fumes in a septic tank. 
    • Even though manual scavenging is banned in India, the practice is still prevalent in many parts of the country.

What is Manual Scavenging?

  • Manual scavenging is the practice of removing human excreta by hand from sewers or septic tanks. 
  • It is mostly carried out by a subgroup of the Dalits, an outcast community also known as “untouchables” within India’s ancient system of caste hierarchies.
    • “Untouchables” are often impoverished, shunned by society and forbidden from touching Indians of other castes, or even their food.
  • India banned the practice under the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 (PEMSR)
    • The Act bans the use of any individual for manually cleaning, carrying, disposing of or otherwise handling in any manner, human excreta till its disposal.

Why is manual scavenging still prevalent in India?

  • The lack of enforcement of the Act and exploitation of unskilled labourers are the reasons why the practice is still prevalent in India. 
  • The Mumbai civic body charges anywhere between Rs 20,000 and Rs 30,000 to clean septic tanks. 
    • The unskilled labourers, meanwhile, are much cheaper to hire and contractors illegally employ them at a daily wage of Rs 300-500.
  • Scavenging continues in parts of India largely due to governmental indifference and social prejudice.
  • There is a complete absence of planning for the maintenance of sewerage, septic tanks, and waste disposal systems in the urban policies made for the city by the state and private companies.
  • The number of people killed while cleaning sewers and septic tanks has increased over the last few years. 
    • 2019 saw the highest number of manual scavenging deaths in the past five years. 

Government Measures to Tackle Manual Scavenging

  • Legislative:
    • The Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act 1993
      • It set imprisonment of up to one year and a fine of Rs 2,000 for pushing a person to manual scavenging.
    • Self Employment Scheme for Rehabilitation of Manual Scavengers (SRMS) 2017 
      • It is a successor scheme to the National Scheme for Liberation and Rehabilitation of Scavengers and their Dependents (NSLRS) with the objective to rehabilitate remaining manual scavengers and their dependents in alternative occupations, in a time-bound manner.
    • Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013
  • The Act put an end to the practice of any form of manual cleaning, carrying, disposing or handling of human waste.
  • The act says the National Commission for Safai Karamcharis (NCSK) would monitor implementation of the Act and enquire into complaints regarding contravention of the provisions of the Act.
  • Amendment Bill, 2020
  • The Bill proposes to completely mechanise sewer cleaning, introduce ways for ‘on-site’ protection and provide compensation to manual scavengers in case of sewer deaths.
  • It will also ban employing people as manual scavengers without protective gear.
  • National Commission for Safai Karamcharis
    • It was constituted on 12th August 1994 as a statutory body by an Act of Parliament viz. National Commission for Safai Karamcharis Act, 1993, for a period of three years i.e. up to 31st March 1997. 
    • However, the validity of the Act was extended up to March 2002 and then up to February 2004 vide Amendment Acts passed in 1997 and 2001 respectively.
  • Recently, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has made a series of recommendations to the Centre to eradicate manual scavenging and these are
    • The Centre should provide Rs. 10 lakh loan to manual scavengers’ family members so that they can start some business activity.
    • The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) should monitor the sewer deaths in its reports.
    • The NHRC recommended expanding the definition of manual scavenging in order to cover other hazardous cleaning or enacting a new law for hazardous cleaning.
  • Supreme Court Directions:
  • The Supreme Court issued directions in 2014 to prevent and control the practice and also to prosecute the offenders.
  • It also directed the government to pay a compensation of Rs. 10 lakh rupees to the family members of those killed in acts of manual scavenging since 1993.
  • Constitutional Safeguards:
  • The Right to Live with Dignity is implicit in the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution. 
  • Article 46 of the Constitution, on the other hand, provides that the State shall protect the weaker sections particularly, the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes from social injustice and all forms of exploitation.

Way Forward

  • The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan should make expansion of the sewer network a top priority and come up with a scheme for scientific maintenance that will end the manual cleaning of septic tanks. 
  • The laws should be enforced vigorously to eliminate manual scavenging in its entirety.
  • There should be trials and testing of protective gears and provisions for better healthcare facilities, insurance cover, pension plans and regulations on preventive and social medicine education for the manual scavengers.

National Human Rights Commission

  • It is an independent statutory body established on 12 October 1993 as per provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act (PHRA) 1993, later amended in 2006
  • It has been established in conformity with the Paris Principles endorsed by the General Assembly of the United Nations by its Regulations 48/134 in 1993.
    • The UN Paris Principles provide the international benchmarks against which NHRIs.
  • It plays four key roles namely protector, advisor, monitor and educator of human rights.
  • Composition
    • The chairperson should be retired Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court
    • One Member who is, or has been, a Judge of the Supreme Court of India
    • One Member who is, or has been, the Chief Justice of a High Court.
    • Two Members are to be appointed from among persons having knowledge of, or practical experience in, matters relating to human rights.
  • Functions:
  • Enquiry into complaints of violation of human rights or negligence in the prevention of such violation by a public servant.
  • Studies treaties and international instruments on human rights and makes recommendations for their effective implementation to the Government.
  • Responsible for spreading human rights awareness amongst the masses.

Source:IE